Est. 2026

Independent, practical writing on work, money, home and life.

Active vs Passive Voice: When Each One Earns Its Place

Passive voice is not an error. It is a tool. Learn how to recognise it, when to avoid it and the few cases where it is the better choice.

A vintage typewriter with the word Writing on the paper

Style advice often treats the passive voice as something to be hunted down. That is too blunt. Passive constructions are grammatical, common and sometimes exactly right. The skill is knowing what each voice does, so that you choose rather than drift.

The basic difference

In the active voice, the subject performs the action: “The committee approved the plan.” In the passive voice, the subject receives it: “The plan was approved by the committee.”

The passive is built from a form of the verb “to be” plus a past participle: was approved, is being reviewed, has been written. The doer of the action can be named with “by”, or left out entirely: “The plan was approved.”

Why the active voice is usually the better default

Active sentences tend to be shorter and more direct. They tell the reader who did what, which makes them easier to follow and often more energetic.

Compare:

  • Passive: “A decision was made to postpone the launch.”
  • Active: “We decided to postpone the launch.”

The second version is shorter, it names the decision-maker and it sounds like a person. In business writing, where clarity matters, that is usually what you want.

When the passive is the right choice

The passive earns its place in a few situations.

  • The doer is unknown or unimportant. “The office was broken into overnight” is natural, because who did it is not yet known.
  • The receiver of the action is the topic. In a paragraph about a patient, “The patient was admitted on Tuesday” keeps the focus where the paragraph is focused.
  • You want a neutral, impersonal tone. Methods sections in scientific writing often use the passive for this reason: “The samples were heated to 60 degrees.”
  • You want to put new information at the end. English tends to place familiar information first and new information last, and the passive can help you arrange that.

When the passive causes trouble

The passive can be used to hide responsibility. “Mistakes were made” is the classic example: it admits an error while avoiding the question of who made it. Readers notice that, and it can erode trust.

Passives also pile up. A paragraph with six passive sentences in a row can feel evasive and heavy, even when each sentence is correct on its own.

A caution about automated checkers

Many writing tools flag every passive construction and treat the count as a score. Treat the flags as prompts to look, not as errors to fix. Some flagged sentences are perfectly good, and some tools miscount forms like “is interested” or “was tired,” which behave more like descriptions than actions.

A quick editing test

When you see a passive sentence in your draft, ask two questions:

  1. Do I know who did the action?
  2. Would the sentence be clearer or stronger if I named them?

If the answer to both is yes, switch to the active voice. If the doer is irrelevant or unknown, or the receiver is the real subject, leave the passive alone. Either way, you will have made a decision about voice instead of letting it happen by accident, and that is what good style is.

Editorial Team Avatar

About the author

The Sunday Letter

One useful read, every Sunday.

A short note from the editors with the week’s most practical article. No hype, no daily blasts.

Sign-ups are handled through our contact page for now.